<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: GST receivable is an asset. But how does a firm have *control* over the GST receivable account?</title>
	<atom:link href="http://FutureFirm.com/blog/gst-receivable-is-an-asset-but-how-does-a-firm-have-control-over-the-gst-receivable-account/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://FutureFirm.com/blog/gst-receivable-is-an-asset-but-how-does-a-firm-have-control-over-the-gst-receivable-account/</link>
	<description>FutureFirm.com</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 22 May 2012 12:44:09 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.2</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: hubertxiv</title>
		<link>http://FutureFirm.com/blog/gst-receivable-is-an-asset-but-how-does-a-firm-have-control-over-the-gst-receivable-account/comment-page-1/#comment-129</link>
		<dc:creator>hubertxiv</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 07 Oct 2009 12:44:40 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://FutureFirm.com/blog/gst-receivable-is-an-asset-but-how-does-a-firm-have-control-over-the-gst-receivable-account/#comment-129</guid>
		<description>If you are preparing a Balance Sheet at year end, the amount of GST on &#039;creditors&#039; is perhaps shown as an asset (or at least as a credit) and the amount payable on Debtors is shown as  a liability. I believe it is preferable to show the actual net amount in the accounts.

If you are working on a &#039;credit&#039; basis then I believe that a net GST should or could be shown as a net figure. On a &#039;cash basis&#039; of course, the GST would not feature in a Balance Sheet</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>If you are preparing a Balance Sheet at year end, the amount of GST on &#8216;creditors&#8217; is perhaps shown as an asset (or at least as a credit) and the amount payable on Debtors is shown as  a liability. I believe it is preferable to show the actual net amount in the accounts.</p>
<p>If you are working on a &#8216;credit&#8217; basis then I believe that a net GST should or could be shown as a net figure. On a &#8216;cash basis&#8217; of course, the GST would not feature in a Balance Sheet</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: miss schlonky</title>
		<link>http://FutureFirm.com/blog/gst-receivable-is-an-asset-but-how-does-a-firm-have-control-over-the-gst-receivable-account/comment-page-1/#comment-128</link>
		<dc:creator>miss schlonky</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 06 Oct 2009 05:03:36 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://FutureFirm.com/blog/gst-receivable-is-an-asset-but-how-does-a-firm-have-control-over-the-gst-receivable-account/#comment-128</guid>
		<description>It&#039;s not an asset. Who told you that? GST collected/receivable is a liability, not a balance sheet asset account. The only assets are the short term equivalent portions of cash in the bank and creditors to the liability of GST collected. GST paid is a contra liability, not an asset either.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>It&#8217;s not an asset. Who told you that? GST collected/receivable is a liability, not a balance sheet asset account. The only assets are the short term equivalent portions of cash in the bank and creditors to the liability of GST collected. GST paid is a contra liability, not an asset either.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

